oh! didn't see this before i clicked on send.

so it was not so much a hassle after all :)

Regrads,
Dumindu.

On Feb 13, 2008 2:06 PM, Senaka Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have added this fix into the head. By default, the Transport Headers
> would not be exposed to a Service. Instead you will have to enable it in
> the axis2.xml. Refer the axis2_manual on the svn head - the axis2.xml
> section. Or modify the "<parameter name="exposeHeaders"
> locked="true">false</parameter>" to "<parameter name="exposeHeaders"
> locked="true">true</parameter>"
>
> Regards,
> Senaka
>
>
> > Hi Kaushalye,
> >
> > I think you are correct. I'm currently investigating the way we could read
> > a param from the axis2.xml inside core_utils.c.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Senaka
> >
> >> Senaka Fernando wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 12, 2008 5:29 PM, Kaushalye Kapuruge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Senaka Fernando wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi again,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also adding to this discussion, we must be fair to REST users too,
> >>>>>> Kaushalye and that makes sense. :)...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> :) Yes. But still I do not accept exposing the password even for REST
> >>>>> users.
> >>>>> I mean this is transport level authentication. The call come to the
> >>>>> service after the transport layer authentication is done. So let's
> >>>>> keep
> >>>>> the authentication logic there.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Yes, in a strict sense, exposing transport headers is a violation of
> >>>> concern. However, pragmatically, this is too much information hidden
> >>>> from the service, specially in REST world. Why don't we allow the user
> >>>> to decide if this functionality is needed?
> >>>>
> >>>> I would suggest adding another param in the axis2.xml. In default
> >>>> configuration it will not be enabled, and if someone intends to use
> >>>> this feature he will have to enable it using the axis2.xml. Any
> >>>> comments?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Dumindu,
> >>>
> >>> The decision should be made inside core_utils.c. I believe that it
> >>> would
> >>> be a great deal of hassle if we are to include it the axis2.xml, and
> >>> propagate it to there. Also, if it is configurable, it should be a
> >>> service
> >>> level configuration. Therefore, I believe it is better to have this
> >>> inside
> >>> a #ifdef block. Therefore, the user will have to compile it allowing
> >>> this
> >>> functionality. Isn't that better? Also, this axis2.xml based filtering
> >>> wouldn't be required, if the user wishes to use this he may simply use
> >>> it,
> >>> or just leave it as it is. It doesn't make any difference to our logic.
> >>>
> >> But if I install with default options and need to allow http headers to
> >> be accessed in a later day(accidentally seeing this thread for example),
> >> I would rather prefer to add an entry to axis2.xml. ;-)
> >> -Kau
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Senaka
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dumindu Pallewela
> >>>> http://blog.dumindu.com
> >>>> GPG ID: 0x9E131672
> >>>>
> >>>> WSO2 | "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" | http://wso2.com
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://blog.kaushalye.org/
> >> http://wso2.org/
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Dumindu Pallewela
http://blog.dumindu.com
GPG ID: 0x9E131672

WSO2 | "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" | http://wso2.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to