I also think chunkBufferSizeForMTOM makes more sense. Actually I first thought about this but felt it is more complex for users. That's why suggest attachmentSize. But with a comment meaning of this param can be simplified.
Thanks, -Manjula. On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 20:24 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Senaka Fernando wrote: > > Hi Samisa, > > > > chunkBufferSize4MTOM or chunkBufferSizeForMTOM ? > > I am OK for the second one. > > Samisa... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
