Hi, If we are going to introduce changes that are not fit into the Axis2/C architecture, for me that implies we are going to change the Axis2/C architecture in 2.x. But I don't see any reason for changing the Axis2/C architecture.
My idea is, the main criteria should be the fixing of which does not fit easily/naturally into the current Axis2/C "design". Regards, Supun.. On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Damitha Kumarage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I can see lot of Jira's resolved, marked as moving the fix to 2.x family. I > would like to open a wiki named Axis2/C 2.x suggestions, which summarize all > the ideas taken from these jiras and also add reference to all these jiras > there. This page can grow util we find one day that it is really neccessary > to do a 2.x. > One thing to notice here is the criteria we should follow to identifying > the jiras, the fix of which should be moved to 2.x family. To me, the main > criteria should be that the fixing of which does not fit easily/naturally > into the current Axis2/C architecture. > What do you think? > thanks, > Damitha > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
