Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
Hi,
If we are going to introduce changes that are not fit into the Axis2/C
architecture, for me that implies we are going to change the Axis2/C
architecture in 2.x. But I don't see any reason for changing the
Axis2/C architecture.
I would like to replace the phrase
'fixing of which does not fit easily/naturally into the current Axis2/C
architecture'
with
'fixing of which does not fit easily/naturally into 1.x family'
in my original mail ;-)
thanks
Damitha
Regards,
Supun..
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Damitha Kumarage
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi,
I can see lot of Jira's resolved, marked as moving the fix to 2.x
family. I would like to open a wiki named Axis2/C 2.x suggestions,
which summarize all the ideas taken from these jiras and also add
reference to all these jiras there. This page can grow util we
find one day that it is really neccessary to do a 2.x.
One thing to notice here is the criteria we should follow to
identifying the jiras, the fix of which should be moved to 2.x
family. To me, the main criteria should be that the fixing of
which does not fit easily/naturally into the current Axis2/C
architecture.
What do you think?
thanks,
Damitha
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
