Hi All, "Chintana Wilamuna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Um .. I don't agree. This was found because of the "new changes to > gcc". Which is really helpful because it caught a function which is > not used anywhere. If it's not used why it's defined in the first > place? Why not remove it altogether until it's used somewhere. > Otherwise it'll take us nowhere because a defined function is not used > anywhere ;-)
If not using anywhere +1 for removing. We had a convention some time ago to remove all unused functions. thanks, Dinesh -- http://nethu.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
