On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 23:52 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> Manjula Peiris wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 20:24 +0530, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote:
> >   
> >> Manjula Peiris wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Seems that every one is ok with this approach. But as I mentioned this
> >>> approach has problems when there are multiple MTOM services. 
> >>>       
> >> You mean threading issues?
> >>     
> >
> > No in the implementation I have specified the callback in the axis2.xml.
> > But when there are many services which have different callbacks then
> > there should be a way to specify them. We can't put this in the
> > services.xml becasue mime_parser does not have any information about the
> > services.
> >   
> 
> I think the correct way to do this is to use the one given in axis2.xml 
> as the default and override that with one in services.xml, if there is 
> one provided. If the callback is set as a parameter, then this will work 
> seamlessly, as service level parameters override conf level params.

When we are invoking the mime_parser the service is not dispatched. So
the mime_parser don't know which callback to load if it is specified in
the services.xml.

> 
> Samisa...
> 
> >   
> >> Thanks,
> >> Samisa...
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Any way I
> >>> will integrate the stuff when the sending side is finished.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Manjula.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 12:12 +0530, Manjula Peiris wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have developed the MTOM Caching stuff and it is almost finished in the
> >>>> receiving side. The implementation is here [1] as a branch. I have
> >>>> tested with a 160MB attachment and the results are promising. The main
> >>>> advantage of this implementation is it keeps a fixed user defined size
> >>>> of the attachment at any moment during the attachment processing. The
> >>>> user can implement his own callback to cache the attachment. I have
> >>>> included a sample callback [2] which stores the attachment in to a
> >>>> file. 
> >>>>
> >>>> Following are the user configurable parameters in axis2.xml.
> >>>>
> >>>> <parameter name="MTOMBufferSize" locked="false">10</parameter>
> >>>>
> >>>> Using this parameter the user can govern the caching threshold. This is
> >>>> in KB and I will fix this to be in MB.For example this is 10 means any
> >>>> attachment greater than 10KB will be cached.
> >>>>
> >>>> <parameter name="MTOMMaxBuffers" locked="false">1000</parameter>
> >>>>
> >>>> This will tell maximum numbers of buffers Axis2/C can handle when the
> >>>> attachment comes with a pretty large SOAP envelope. Because we are not
> >>>> caching the SOAP envelope.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> <parameter name="MTOMCachingCallback"
> >>>> locked="false">/path/to/your/caching_callabck</parameter>
> >>>>
> >>>> User will specify the callback name using this parameter so that Axis2/C
> >>>> can load when it wants to cache the attachment. If the user does not
> >>>> specify this the attachment will be in memory.
> >>>>
> >>>> I also added a flag called 'cached' to the axiom_data_handler. This flag
> >>>> will tell whether the attachment is cached or not using the user
> >>>> provided callback. If it is cached then it is user's responsibility in
> >>>> his client/service code to find the attachment, because Axis2/C cached
> >>>> it using his callback.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have a one major problem in this model. That is if there are more than
> >>>> one mtom services and if those are going to use different callbacks then
> >>>> we can't specify this in axis2.xml. We can't specify this in
> >>>> services.xml either because attachment separation happens before
> >>>> accessing the service. 
> >>>>
> >>>> So really appreciate your ideas regarding the above parameters, callback
> >>>> and the problem I have mentioned above.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/branches/c/post_1_4_mtom/c
> >>>>
> >>>> [2]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/branches/c/post_1_4_mtom/c/samples/mtom_caching_callback/mtom_caching_callback.c
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Manjula 
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>   
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>> Checked by AVG. 
> >>> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.0.0/1489 - Release Date: 6/7/2008 
> >>> 11:17 AM
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>     
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG. 
> > Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.0.0/1489 - Release Date: 6/7/2008 
> > 11:17 AM
> >   
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to