Well, good news. While getting simpleAxisServer running, it failed due to missing dlls
msvcp70.dll
msvcr70.dll
Putting these in c:\windows\system32 got simplesAxisServer AND apache2 running! mod_axis2.dll loads!
 
Thanks much for the help. -Frank
 
PS Why aren't the webservices dlls included in the distributions since 1.5?
 
 


From: John Hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:52 AM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: RE: Axis C++ 1.6Beta fails to load mod_axis2.dll


OK, that's good !

It means that axis is either never being loaded at all or it's not even getting past the first 10 lines of code !

I think the best thing you can do is try to get simple_axis server working outside of apache. Could you do that and see if it works OK?











"Frank Voellmann \(fvoellma\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

15/03/2006 19:54

Please respond to
"Apache AXIS C User List" <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>

To
"Apache AXIS C User List" <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>
cc
Subject
RE: Axis C++ 1.6Beta fails to load mod_axis2.dll





The 15-Mar nightly did the same thing, with no trace file created.
 


From: John Hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:58 AM
To:
Apache AXIS C User List
Subject:
RE: Axis C++ 1.6Beta fails to load mod_axis2.dll



Unfortunately - I just remembered that 1.6 beta doesn't have the code changes that I need ! The nightly build does though - can you try that pls?




"Frank Voellmann \(fvoellma\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/03/2006 16:22:57:

> I've set this env var to

> c:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache2\Axis\log\startupTrace.log

> then

> c:\startupTrace.log

> each time no file was created (new dos shell, net stop apache2, net
> start apache2).

>  

> Is this a clue?

>
> From: John Hawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:34 AM
> To: Apache AXIS C User List
> Subject: Re: Axis C++ 1.6Beta fails to load mod_axis2.dll


>
> Could you put start-up trace on for axis please. Set an env
> AXISCPP_STARTUP_TRACE=logfilename
>
> The log might give you some clues
>
>


>
> "Frank Voellmann \(fvoellma\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 14/03/2006 20:56
>
> Please respond to
> "Apache AXIS C User List" <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>

>
> To

>
> <axis-c-user@ws.apache.org>
>
> cc

>
> Subject

>
> Axis C++ 1.6Beta fails to load mod_axis2.dll

>
>
>
>
> Hi,
> While developing my application, I've had Axis C++ 1.5 and 1.6Beta
> running on Win2000 Server successfully, and 1.5 running on Win2003
> Server successfully too. My final deliverable requires Axis C++ 1.6Beta
> (due to other issues that were fixed) running on Win2003 Server. This
> particular configuration has the EXACT same problem as reported by
> others for different combinations of OS and Axis C++ version:
>
>
>
> Syntax error on line 957 of C:/Program Files/Apache
> Group/Apache2/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load C:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/modules/mod_axis2.dll
> into server: The specified module could not be
> found.
>
> From Event Viewer:
> The Apache service named  reported the following error:
> >>> Cannot load C:/Program Files/Apache
> Group/Apache2/modules/mod_axis2.dll into server: The specified module
> could not be found.     .
> and
> The Apache service named  reported the following error:
> >>> Syntax error on line 957 of C:/Program Files/Apache
> Group/Apache2/conf/httpd.conf:     .
>
> Line 957 is the first line below:
>
> LoadModule axis_module                 modules/mod_axis2.dll
> <Location /axis>
> SetHandler axis
> </Location>
>
> If I comment this line, Apache starts on Win2003, but axis is not
> available. I've followed all the instructions in wininstall-guide,
> triple checked it was done correctly, the module is there, in the
> correct directory ... HELP!
>
> Has this problem been seen by others using 1.6Beta?
> Has there been any solutions for other OS/AxisC++ combinations that I
> could try?
>
> I'm running:
> Windows Server 2003 R2, Enterprise Edition, SP1
> Apache 2.0.55 (apache_2.0.55-win32-x86-nossl.msi)
>
> Any suggestions appreciated, Thanks
> Frank
>
>
>

Reply via email to