Done. --- David Marquard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can this patch get applied in time for 1.1rc2? > > The actual patch is attached to bug #17021. > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17021 > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vidyanand Murunikkara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: VOTE : Should we do this patch? (was RE: Request that zero > length array interop patch be applied in ti me f or 1.1 final) > > > +1 for the patch. > > Thanks > Vidyanand. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:21 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: VOTE : Should we do this patch? (was RE: Request that zero > length array interop patch be applied in ti me f or 1.1 final) > > > > OK committers, time to step up and decide this thing. > > Please vote +1 if you think we should reopen the bug and fix it by > applying the patch, -1 if you think we shouldn't, and +/-0 if you're > ambivalent. > > I myself am for including the patch, since it doesn't change our default > behavior, and does allow people who are having problems with buggy .NET > installations to get up and running, which at the end of the day is what > we're really hoping for anyway. We should make sure there are comments > describing why it's there, but I see no harm in including it. > > So: +1 > > --Glen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Marquard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:47 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: Request that zero length array interop patch be > > applied in > > ti me f or 1.1 final > > > > > > It is fixed in .Net 1.1 beta, but the only shipping, > > supported version of > > .Net is 1.0 at this point. .Net 1.1 final won't be released > > for quite some > > time yet. > > > > The problem still exists because the only shipping, supported > > version of > > .Net can't communicate with an axis server at this point, and > > still won't be > > able to in the near- to mid-future. > > > > Please reconsider the decision to mark the bug invalid. Even > > though the bug > > is in a 3rd party client, the patch fixes a problem that > > users (like myself) > > will encounter in "real world" usage. The patch is still > > extremely small and > > well contained (the core of which is about a 4 line change to > > one method), > > and provides a big interop win without sacraficing axis correctness. > > > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James M Snell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:21 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Request that zero length array interop patch be > > applied in > > ti me f or 1.1 final > > > > > > Hmm.. ok, I was reluctant to do this anyway ... and since > > it's been fixed > > in .NET 1.1, then I retract my original "this sounds > > reasonable" and give > > it a -1. > > > > - James Snell > > IBM Emerging Technologies > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > (559) 587-1233 (office) > > (700) 544-9035 (t/l) > > Programming Web Services With SOAP > > O'Reilly & Associates, ISBN 0596000952 > > > > Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. > > Do not be terrified, do not be discouraged, for the Lord your > > God will be with you whereever you go. - Joshua 1:9 > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 02/20/2003 07:29 AM > > Please respond to axis-dev > > > > > > To > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc > > > > bcc > > > > Subject > > RE: Request that zero length array interop patch be applied > > in ti me > > f or 1.1 final > > > > > > > > I would be in favour of this. > > Note that this is fixed in .NET 1.1, when this patch is > > applied I would > > propose to add a note to bugzilla for removal from the next > > Axis release > > after .NET 1.1 is out. This to avoid accumulating bloat. > > > > Thanks, > > > > - ArentJan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Marquard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: woensdag 19 februari 2003 23:46 > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: Request that zero length array interop patch be > > applied in time > > f or 1.1 final > > > > > > I'd like to request that the patch in bug #17021 > > (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17021) be > > applied in > > time > > for the 1.1 final release. > > > > Currently, .Net 1.0 clients cannot deserialize objects from axis that > > contain zero length arrays due to a bug in Microsoft's deserializer. > > Basically, .Net 1.0's deserializer goes belly up if a zero > > length array > > doesn't have an explicit closing tag (i.e., <myArray/> fails, but > > <myArray></myArray> works). > > > > The patch adds a new configuration option to axis called > > "sendMinimizedElements", which when set to "false" causes > > axis to always > > send explicit closing tags for empty elements. This cleanly > > works around > > the > > Microsoft bug, but does not sacrafice axis's correctness. The default > > value > > of the new option is "true", which does not change axis's current > > behavior. > > > > The patch is extremely small (< 20 lines changed) and simple. > > It does not > > change axis's behavior unless a user explicitely sets the new > > configuration > > option to "false". All in all, it's a very safe patch that > > provides big > > bang > > for the buck on the interop side of things. > > > > Dave > > _________________________________________ > > Dave Marquard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >
===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/