Here is my +1 for Thilina Thanks,
Jaliya -----Original Message----- From: Aleksander Slominski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:30 AM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: [VOTE][axis2] Thilina for Axis2 commiter [Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch Chathura Herath wrote: >Here is my +1 for Thilina's committership proposal. > > +1 alek >I am with the idea that we should go ahead and MTOMize the OM if we have the >right impl. Thilina's Architecture looks fine to me, but would like to see a >bit of a documentation and other views (if any) too. > >Regards >Chathura > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Deepal Jayasinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:41 AM >>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org >>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch >> >>Here is my +1 for the vote to propose Thilina as a committer >> >> >>Deepal. >> >> >> >> >>>Well, I went through MTOM architecture a bit. For me the architecture is >>>good and it integrates with OM smoothly. >>> >>>So I'd like to integrate MTOM in to the main area. >>> >>>And this is my +1 for Sanjiva's idea to propose Thilina as a committer. >>> >>>-- Chinthaka >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:52 PM >>>>To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Ajith Ranabahu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch >>>> >>>>Defer until F2F discussion on the right arch for MTOM support? >>>>The last time we had the discussion on the list IIRC there were >>>>multiple proposals .. but now we have at least one concrete >>>>realization. >>>> >>>>In any case, seems to me we should put up Thilina for committer? >>>> >>>>Sanjiva. >>>> >>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>From: "Ajith Ranabahu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:07 PM >>>>Subject: Re: [Axis2] MTOM Patch >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi dims, >>>>>Well I don't think we should commit MTOM stuff directly into the main >>>>>area. Since we have not yet agreed officially on any MTOM >>>>>representation mechanism, my guess is we should keep it in the >>>>> >>>>> >>scratch >> >> >>>>>area for the time being. >>>>>(Actually that is why we did not commit it in the main area in the >>>>>first place :)) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0500, Davanum Srinivas >>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>can someone integrate the mtom stuff into the main area? >>>>>> >>>>>>-- dims >>>>>> >>>>>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:54:15 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne >>>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Please apply the patch to scratch/thilina/mtom folder. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>>Thilina. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>-- >>>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>Ajith Ranabahu >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > > -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
