Hi,

> 
> Hi Dims!
> Thanks for the pointer to XMLUnit. So far, I was using a trial version 
> of XMLDiff in quite an ugly fashion...phew!!!
> Today I incorporated the XMLUnit and tested the conformance in the 
> suggested three step fashion. Load, Save, Compare. And the results 
> stand as follows Of all the files present in the suite, 435 files were 
> parsed and built into a serializable object model without throwing 
> exceptions. But of them only 381 files have the serialized xml (from 
> OM datastructures) matching with the original xml file used as input.

That looks promising ;)

> 
> As of now, in OM, comment elements are not taken care of. I think I 
> can manage Comment information item. That can improve the success rate 
> by good amount. I'm currently finalizing the interface of OMComment.

Did u committed the stuff to the main tree ??

Plus, can u please publish the test stuff in a wiki as well. So that
other people ,might also be able to re-test the stuff with your
guidelines.

Regards,

-- Chinthaka

> On Apr 8, 2005 2:34 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.w3.org/XML/Test/
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2005 3:51 PM, Mark D. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > could you provide a link to the test suite?
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: jayachandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 2:13 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: [Axis2]w3c XML Test suite Conformance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Guys!
> > > >
> > > > Our team here tested to see where our current OM implementation stands
> > > > on the w3c xml test suite conformance and found out that, of the 2500
> > > > odd sample XMLs given there, around 490 are getting properly parsed
> > > > without any excpetions getting thrown. The rest of the files are
> > > > failing because most of them contained the unsupported DTD, PI and
> > > > Comment element types in them. XML Infoset spec requires
> > > > implementation for these three types as well. Comment elements appear
> > > > manageable and I was successful in implementing (just a rough work
> > > > though) them. But the rest two seem slightly complex to me. Any
> > > > ideas/suggestions/pointers, helping hands interested in taking this
> > > > forward?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Jaya
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >
> 
> --
> -- Jaya
> 


-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Eran Chinthaka

Reply via email to