Let him at least write the code and then you can -1 it. what's gotten into you? :)
-- dims On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An ENTIRE line of bug-compatible code?? Oh my god, how terrible! Hell > no, definite -1 on that one!!!! > > Sanjiva. > > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:31 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > it's a one line change!!! > > > > On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 07:44 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > Can we do this? let's try to be accomodating to what we accept (means > > > > accept messages with or without '<' and '>') but generate messages > > > > according to the RFC? At least till we get confirmation from the folks > > > > researching the problem? > > > > > > Um .. temporary bug compat mode? I'd rather just let it be until we get > > > feedback from the MSFT guys .. I'm sure they'll report back soon saying > > > "yes its a bug we'll fix it" and then we can do the right thing. Once > > > you start putting these "conveniences" it becomes hard to remove 'em .. > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
