On 9/10/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> > it might also be worth considering using uberjar and jarjar to create > > an absolutely standard release jar contain all dependencies. > > (axis2-standard.jar, say.) > > If I understand your meaning correctly, I'd think "complete" would be > better than "standard" for that, but we can work out all the naming > issues as we move forward. For now we should decide if indeed we want > something like jar styles, and get the framework implemented in the > maven project files. +1 - robert
