Glen wrote: > There would only be one common filename - the differentiation would > happen via the XML inside the file, which would either be <serviceGroup> > or <service>. > > I'm +1 for this idea of switching based on the XML, and I like > "services.xml" as the file name.
+1 services.xml with <service> or <serviceGroup> in it would be very nice. -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development
