Eran Chinthaka wrote:
See here (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-232).
Just added a JIRA to make sure we will keep track of this.
Thanks Steve for the comments (and for the disappointing blog entry ;-) )
oh dont take it personally.
I quite like one aspect of the design, the interface to get info from
the fault. I just think we could
-extend the interface to ask for the entire soap OM if the class will
provide it (optional? separate interface?)
-add those other bits of SOAP1.2 faults (actor?)
-add access to the OM of the details inside the fault
-get things like stack trace, hostname in there; do it consistent with
the axis1 namespaces
I'm doing faults in my own code now; I may try and extend Axis to meet
my needs but am constrained by
-it wont build on a java1.5 system
-I dont want to break everything before the next alpha
-time, so little time
Steve Loughran wrote:
The Axis2 fault is a lot more minimal than the Axis1 one. Is the
reason for this just lack of time/effort, or does it reflect a
different view on how SOAPFaults should be handled?
-steve
