On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:56 -0500, Tom Jordahl wrote: > If users are trying to use the data binding and it doesn’t meet their > needs, how can it be a slippery slope?
Where would you draw the line Tom? Substitution groups? Attribute groups? Or would you not draw a line at all? If we do all of XML Schema then we are reinventing XMLBeans or something similar. That's clearly not the core competency of SOAP implementors; so would that be a core part of a SOAP implementation. I'm *really* hoping that Paul Downey's new WG [1] on schema patterns for data binding does something useful so that we can stop this debate and draw the line at that! Sanjiva. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/xsdb/
