Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release

[Eran Chinthaka]

Thilina, This is the not last release in Axis2. What I propose is to release whatever we have so far after the last release. We don't have a nightly build mechanism also. I saw a mail in the user list saying he likes a release after several bug fixes. and that guy knows that the bug is fixed in the SVN version and not in the last releaes.  Remember, we all agreed to release often (and more parties ;-) ) I think we have pretty much stuff to go for the next release. Chinthaka Thilina Gunarathne wrote: Hi all, I know this will light the flames again... How about finalising the AxisFault issues for the next release... Support for SOAP 1.2 fualts.. Also ws-Addressing testing. Specially the final version.. My two cents... Thanks, ~Thilina On 11/4/05, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it is a bit misleading to characterize what I am expecting as being **everything**. Axis 1.x doesn't even come close to everything. But it is still very useable. What I would hope is that ADB can be used with a typical WSDL found in the wild – UDDI, Amazon.com <http://amazon.com/>, Google, etc, etc. If it doesn't work with the WSDL users are likely to want to consume, then they will just walk away. Or maybe they will figure out how to use XMLBeans. Maybe. Just my 2 cents. -- Tom Jordahl ------------------------------ *From:* Eran Chinthaka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:06 PM *To:* axis-dev@ws.apache.org *Subject:* Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release One more comment. Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding framework for Axis2, during the second Axis2 f2f ? We were very clear that we didn't want a full data binding tool. (Glen, Dims you all were there too.) So Tom, its unfair for you to expect *everything* from ADB. If you want full support use any of the existing data binding tools with Axis2. I think the existing stuff would be far better than Axis2 as they were built by domain experts. So do we need to re-invent the wheel here ? Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:56 -0500, Tom Jordahl wrote: If users are trying to use the data binding and it doesn't meet their needs, how can it be a slippery slope? Where would you draw the line Tom? Substitution groups? Attribute groups? Or would you not draw a line at all? If we do all of XML Schema then we are reinventing XMLBeans or something similar. That's clearly not the core competency of SOAP implementors; so would that be a core part of a SOAP implementation. I'm *really* hoping that Paul Downey's new WG [1] on schema patterns for data binding does something useful so that we can stop this debate and draw the line at that! Sanjiva. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/xsdb/ -- "May the SourcE be with u" http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ http://www.bloglines.com/blog/Thilina