+1 from me. On 1/1/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like Ajith has forgotten the subject prefix. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Internationalizing the code ! > Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:26:39 +0600 > From: Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > To: Axis developer list <axis-dev@ws.apache.org> > > Hi all, > I'm planning to internationalize the codegenerator (and rest of the > databinding stuff including ADB) soon. However I do not feel that the > particulat I18n resource files should go into the common module. Rather I > feel that it would be appropriate for each module to have it's own resource > bundle , at least for the I18n issue. > Here are some reasons why I think it should be so > 1. Ease of finding the relevant entry. It would be confusing to browse a > list of 1000 entries rather than a list of 100 entries :) > 2. Due to the modularity it will be easier for users who wish to utilize > only the components, not the whole system. Say there could be users who wish > to use only ADB, with the I18n support and it is not fair to ask them to > download a hugh resource file which is 90% junk as far as their requirement > is concerned! > > I do see that we may not have the reusability advantage. But this seems to > be better in the long term rather than having a single file that contains > all the entries! > > Thoughts anyone ? > > -- > Ajith Ranabahu > > >
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
