I think we are done with the format of the version number ,
but I have some other problem to solve now say we have multiple version of
the same module in the system , and right now at the deployment time I call
the init method of each module (since we don't have the notion of module
version yet) , there if the module want to do some stuff they can do that ,
as an example in RM case if it has saved some data they can get them back at
the initialization stage.
But the problem is what are we going to do if there are multiple versions of
the same module , should we need to call init method of all the modules ?
where they are going to be engaged or not.
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [axis2] Module versions support
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 00:50 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
just reviewed the original email again...it talks about
xyz-00.0000.mar hence the confusion.
So, we should go with say security-1.23.mar. Right? just to be absolutely
clear.
Right .. or security-1.235486.mar etc... basically we expect the format
to be modulename-{majorversion}.{minorversion}.mar where the two version
#s are integers. (Major should not have any leading zeros but that's
just a redundant comment - anyone who puts that deserves whatever
behavior they get.)
Sanjiva.
