Hi all;
Without having a knowledge of module version user should be able to engage a
module . In that case we have to get the default version
(there will be two ways of engaging a module )
1. engageModule(String moduleName);
2 . engageModule(String moduleName , String moduleVersion);
Finding default version of some module if there are more than one module,
1. If there are multiple versions of the same module it can possible to
specify the default version in axis2.xml as follows
<defaultModuleVersions>
<module name="abc" version="1.23">
<module name="foo" version="0.89">
</defaultModuleVersions>
2. If there are multiple versions of the same module and user does not
specify that in axis2.xml then the default version will be the latest
version
comments .....?
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~
----- Original Message -----
From: "Deepal Jayasinghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [axis2] Module versions support
I think we are done with the format of the version number ,
but I have some other problem to solve now say we have multiple version of
the same module in the system , and right now at the deployment time I
call the init method of each module (since we don't have the notion of
module version yet) , there if the module want to do some stuff they can
do that , as an example in RM case if it has saved some data they can get
them back at the initialization stage.
But the problem is what are we going to do if there are multiple versions
of the same module , should we need to call init method of all the modules
? where they are going to be engaged or not.
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [axis2] Module versions support
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 00:50 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
just reviewed the original email again...it talks about
xyz-00.0000.mar hence the confusion.
So, we should go with say security-1.23.mar. Right? just to be
absolutely clear.
Right .. or security-1.235486.mar etc... basically we expect the format
to be modulename-{majorversion}.{minorversion}.mar where the two version
#s are integers. (Major should not have any leading zeros but that's
just a redundant comment - anyone who puts that deserves whatever
behavior they get.)
Sanjiva.