+1 to axis2-core.jar Yes to (2), we can do that.
thanks, dims On 1/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to add a bit more to this: > > (1) Instead of axis2.jar for the base jar, how about axis2-core.jar? > > (2) Can we also plan on importing the various axis2-{foo}-{version}.jar > files into ibiblio? Then anyone (e.g., Synapse) who wants a specific > version of the axis2 core, simply puts a dependency on the right jars > and they have it. > > Sanjiva. > > On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 20:26 +0600, Eran Chinthaka wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi Srinath, > > > > Srinath Perera wrote: > > > > > +1 for the proposal > > > > > > 1) in the binary distribution shall we have the security and RM > > > modules included. that way we have the complete WS-Stack re lase. > > > (Or may be we can have a separate dist for that). > > > > How many such modules we gonna include with Axis2 and how can we draw > > a line to decide which modules to include and what not to include. > > Remember we have other WS-* impls like Kandula2. And, I believe that > > RM, Security must be maintained on its own and not within Axis2 (even > > though security is now with Axis2, later that should be moved in to > > WSS4J project). > > > > Lets keep the standard distribution to the minimum from Axis2. If user > > needs those, they can always go to the modules releases page and > > download them. > > But, I accept that Addressing is tightly integrated to Axis2 so its > > worth shipping it with Axis2. At the same time, this will not hinder > > addressing by releasing on its own, without waiting Axis2 to release. > > > > > > > > 2) I believe we should consider XML Beans or JAXB as our principal > > > data binding option. It is usual belief JAXB is faster.May be we > > > should try it too. At least to me data binding is already solved > > > problems and do not worth additional effort. > > > > Agreed. But I don't like to have XMLBeans or JAXB the default. Lets > > have ADB the default, which is the bear minimum and lets keep the > > flexibility to integrate any db framework. > > > > > I think best way to go is provide simple schema support with ADB > > > and ask users to go for JAXB/XMLBeans if they want to handle schema > > > that do not fell in the ADB capablity. If we keep trying add better > > > and better schema support to ADB we might end up creating a mess > > > out of ADB. AFAIK experience with Axis 1.x show maintaining a ADB > > > is a major hassle. > > > > Srinath, I think all the devs are now merging in to your idea. Thats > > why we always say "we have complete simple type support and limited > > complex type support with ADB". Can you remember we agreed to have ADB > > built-in so that user will have out of the box simple data binding > > support. If he is not satisfied with that let him go and plugin > > whatever he wants in to Axis2. > > > > > > > > +1 not include ADB in minimal ..or add it as separate jar. > > > > I agree with Dennis' proposal with the Sanjiva's comments. So let > > leave adb out of the minimal jar and have axis2-adb-version.jar. > > > > - -- Chinthaka > > > > > > > > Thanks Srinath > > > > > > On 1/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 21:49 +1300, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Eran, > > >>> > > >>> I'd really prefer to see ADB kept out of the axis2-xxx.jar. > > >>> This is partially to keep the size to a minimum, but also to > > >>> make sure there aren't any improper ties to the ADB code. Is > > >>> there any reason it can't be kept a separate jar, like the > > >>> other data binding alternatives? > > >> > > >> Good point- how about we keep it as a separate jar, but include > > >> it in the minimal distribution as well? We did ADB as a way to > > >> have some default data binding and so having it around would > > >> support that pattern. However, keeping it as a separate maven > > >> module and jar enforces that we don't take any shortcuts. > > >> > > >> In any case, I proposed that we continue to fully support > > >> XMLBeans data binding as well because ADB does not handle all of > > >> XSD in any case. Once other data binders are available (JibX?) we > > >> should treat them the same way. > > >> > > >> Sanjiva. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) > > > > iD8DBQFDuTgPjON2uBzUhh8RAgLMAKCCs0TMjXu8U2nLoXN6rGU9gKrgJgCgoaMT > > EvNqe88fZVcqkOzpq6HzxzM= > > =iJDF > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/