Re: [axis2] move axiom to ws-commons

[Eran Chinthaka]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1   Ok, then let me start on this. (Our beloved AXIOM is going away from Axis2 to a new home  ;( ) - -- Chinthaka Srinath Perera wrote: > Nice to hear it Jeremy! +1, lets separate it :) Thanks Srinath > > On 1/31/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1. let's do it :) >> >> -- dims >> >> On 1/31/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Paul Fremantle wrote: >>> >>>> I think there is more benefit to this than just the >>>> WS-Policy. >>>> >>>> For example, AXIOM could be used by any of a number of >>>> projects that need a lazily-built tree. In Synapse, we use >>>> AXIOM extensively just to parse our config. And also, >>>> although Synapse has a heavy dependency on Axis2, the core >>>> model of Synapse was built to only depend on AXIOM. So I >>>> think this is worth doing now. >>>> >>>> It also seems to me that Axiom is pretty stable, which >>>> motivates it. >>>> >>>> But I agree, Dims, if that was the only reason, then it would >>>> be simple to fix. But the circular dependency is just an >>>> outcome of AXIOM getting wider usage as an XML model >>>> >>> Tuscany may also want to use AXIOM in an implementation of >>> SDO2. Although the SCA implementation is migrating to Axis2, it >>> would be better if the SDO part could just pick up AXIOM. It >>> would help if it was available separately. >>> >>> -- Jeremy >>> >>> >> >> -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ >> > > > -- ============================ Srinath Perera: > http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/ > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)   iD8DBQFD34EsjON2uBzUhh8RAnSyAJ9i0xtB/HB74C6xKxaDukacm7hssQCbBDbU hSV1jNiqdRb/zigP1auWSrk= =8wDv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----