+1 for the next release. No objections for 1.5 nor for 1.1.

Thanks,
~Thilina

On 9/4/06, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have no objection of calling its as 1.5 ,

btw if we do so that give us a wrong signal next Axis2 version will be
Axis2 2.0  ;-)

Thanks
Deepal

Davanum Srinivas wrote:

> +1 from me. Can we make it 1.5 instead of 1.1? There are just too many
> changes :)
>
> -- dims
>
> On 9/4/06, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all;
>>
>> Axis2 1.0 release on 05/05/2006 and it took about four month after that
>> release and I think this is the good time for next release (well we
>> discuss this sometimes ago in the list :) ).
>>
>> Well we have few blockers to fix and I am sure that we can fix them
>> soon :)
>>
>> As you know there are a number of SNAPSHOT dependencies for various
>> projects , the problem is how to get stable release for those, we can
>> not release Axis2 1.1 with any SNAPSHOT dependences.
>>  - Axiom
>>  - jibx
>>  - neethi
>>  - woden
>>  - XmlSchema
>>
>> I think we will be able to get release for axiom , neethi and xmlScheam
>> before Axis2 release , but not sure about other two.
>>
>> Any way I am +1 on releasing Axis2 1.1 on week starting form 18th
>> Septembers.
>>
>> Any suggestions ......
>>
>> Thanks
>> Deepal
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>

--
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
"May the SourcE be with u"
http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/
http://thilinag.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/Thilina

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to