Hi Jochen and all, SNAPSHOT is a SNAPSHOT and it has no version in it, IMO. What do you gain by putting a number with a SNAPSHOT. Snapshots are mostly unstable versions of a project and we don't wanna know after which version it was created.
Let me ask this question also, who will use a SNAPSHOT of a project, say a snapshot of Axis2? I think projects like Sandesha will use it. They will depend on trunk and not on any of the branches. Maintaining branch versions is an internal version, IMO. So I always prefer to have snapshot without a version number in it. So +1 for just snapshot. My 2 cents. -- Chinthaka Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > >> Could u please explain a bit more. What do u think the version of the >> 'trunk' should be ? >> (until we move to maven 2) > > What's wrong with "1.2-SNAPSHOT" (Maven convention) or "1.2-dev", > which Jakarta used to have? I believe we agree, that subsequent 1.1.x > versions won't come out of the trunk, and we can change that to > 2.0-SNAPSHOT or whatever at any time, should that be desirable. > > Jochen > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature