+1 from me. Sanjiva.
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 14:18 +0530, Eran Chinthaka wrote: > Hi Jochen and all, > > SNAPSHOT is a SNAPSHOT and it has no version in it, IMO. What do you > gain by putting a number with a SNAPSHOT. Snapshots are mostly unstable > versions of a project and we don't wanna know after which version it was > created. > > Let me ask this question also, who will use a SNAPSHOT of a project, > say a snapshot of Axis2? I think projects like Sandesha will use it. > They will depend on trunk and not on any of the branches. Maintaining > branch versions is an internal version, IMO. > > So I always prefer to have snapshot without a version number in it. > > So +1 for just snapshot. > > My 2 cents. > > -- Chinthaka > > Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > > > >> Could u please explain a bit more. What do u think the version of the > >> 'trunk' should be ? > >> (until we move to maven 2) > > > > What's wrong with "1.2-SNAPSHOT" (Maven convention) or "1.2-dev", > > which Jakarta used to have? I believe we agree, that subsequent 1.1.x > > versions won't come out of the trunk, and we can change that to > > 2.0-SNAPSHOT or whatever at any time, should that be desirable. > > > > Jochen > > > > > > -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/ Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
