We talked about this at the beginning .. and concluded that this was the
right solution because synchronizing *EVERY* access was way overkill and
would add a HUGE performance overhead.
PLEASE don't change this unless (1) we have a problem that we're trying to
solve and (2) we have some idea of the perf impact. AFAIK, we've loaded
Axis2 pretty heavily and never had a synchronization problem. If we do
have such problems I agree with Chathura that aggressive solution is the
right answer.
Sanjiva.
Srinath Perera wrote:
Did we had a reason to use HashMaps instead of Hashtables?, which I
belive is the correct approach. Please Comment
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2794
Thanks
Srinath
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
