Dims, If the axis2 community had agreed to do that then one of the core members of the axis2 team should do that, (we don't want to move the code inside axis2 and mess with your project, would you like me moving the transports out from axis2 kernel??? also with the objections in that thread), but as you can clearly see there were tons of objections and no one was ready to move them out except for Deepal and Sanjiva? Again I agree there was no vote, but that did not happen....
Thanks, Ruwan On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Asankha, > > FWIW, > > 1) I see a +1 from Deepal and Dr. Sanjiva > 2) No one did a -1 > 3) There was no VOTE > > So, where's the beef? AFAICT, No one objected to someone else doing the > work :) > > So all i can see is an implicit and not to mention unilateral decision to > fork the code and leave the copy in Axis2 stale. > > - -- dims > > Asankha C. Perera wrote: > | Check this thread > | > < > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/synapse-dev/200710.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > > > > > | as well titled "Getting axis2 transport out from the kernel" > | > | asankha > | > | Davanum Srinivas wrote: > |> Ruwan, > |> > |> All i see is some discussion, which happens on a topic > |> > |> http://marc.info/?t=119684680300006&r=1&w=3 > |> > |> - Where is the push back? From who? > |> - Where is the VOTE? > |> - Where is a -1? > |> > |> thanks, > |> dims > | > | > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) > > iD8DBQFIDlCRgNg6eWEDv1kRAuSDAKCtn+NYtfbFSiR/qXd4wncGymFhywCeNBjU > 86McoG01Pp5nJ2ahQFYJrk0= > =kPhE > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Ruwan Linton http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
