> I am sorry Srinath if you get confused from my previous mail, I did not > tell we should not looking into what you mentioned. What I told was you > can get your handler resolution done with current impl.
> > And I think what Amila did was something similar to what you mentioned. > As long as you do not break the current use cases, I have no problem of > tuning the handler resolution. Does Amila has a different implementation which does not merged with the current Head? I drew all conclusions looking at CVS head. If it is already done or somone doing it, so much the better :) Thanks Srinath -- ============================ Srinath Perera: Indiana University, Bloomington http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/ http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani
