On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am sorry Srinath if you get confused from my previous mail, I did not > > tell we should not looking into what you mentioned. What I told was you > > can get your handler resolution done with current impl. > > > > > And I think what Amila did was something similar to what you mentioned. > > As long as you do not break the current use cases, I have no problem of > > tuning the handler resolution. > > Does Amila has a different implementation which does not merged with > the current Head? No. I just have mentioned a possible algorithm to do it. thanks, Amila. I drew all conclusions looking at CVS head. If it is > already done or somone doing it, so much the better :) > Thanks > Srinath > > > -- > ============================ > Srinath Perera: > Indiana University, Bloomington > http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/<http://www.cs.indiana.edu/%7Ehperera/> > http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani > -- Amila Suriarachchi WSO2 Inc. blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
