hi, I tested the distribution (after adding http transport) with some samples and it passes all the test cases. Earlier I had some test with the Sandesha2 security and rampart and worked fine. So I think we can put an RC and release it there are no any critical issues.
thanks, Amila. On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Amila Suriarachchi < amilasuriarach...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jarek Gawor <jga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The local module and http module (source only) is now moved to Axis2. >> Please give it a try and see if things look ok. If so, we'll merge it >> to 1.5 branch. > > > I ran some sample tests with a sanpshot release and it worked fine. > (tested with both simple http server and war under tomcat) > So we can move it to branch and remove the transport dependency. > > >> >> I kept the http module in the Transport project but I had to change >> the artifact name to prevent a conflict with the Axis2 http transport >> module. Btw, I think that the Transport project should have its own >> group id (e.g org.apache.axis2.transport instead of org.apache.axis2). > > > but anyway we are going to remove the http and local transports from the > commons transport module isn't it? > > IMHO also transport module should have a different group id and a package > structure. > > thanks, > Amila. > >> >> The Transport http module only has the tests now. If we could refactor >> the tests somehow that would be great but I guess it's not critical >> for 1.5. >> >> Thanks, >> Jarek >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Glen Daniels <g...@thoughtcraft.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi folks: >> > >> > First, many thanks to Jarek for getting the transport move going - I got >> > sucked into other stuff today and probably won't be able to dive back in >> for >> > real until Sunday. Just talked to Jarek on IRC and he's hoping to >> finish the >> > move tonight or tomorrow. >> > >> > That said.... I'm not very happy about the idea of leaving important >> tests in >> > the WS-Commons area if the code they're testing is actually in Axis2. >> This >> > smells of bad refactoring and future confusion. >> > >> > I want to get Axis2 1.5 out ASAP, and am willing to do whatever gets us >> there >> > quickest, but after that I'd like to have another discussion about how >> to >> > correctly host and factor the transports code. This should dovetail >> nicely >> > with another round of the "Splitting WS" conversation, which I'd like to >> have >> > at the same time. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > --Glen >> > >> > Andreas Veithen wrote: >> >> Note that the tests applied to the (default Axis2) HTTP transport >> >> initially were not meant to test the transport but to validate the >> >> generic HTTP tests in the testkit. The purpose was to apply these >> >> generic tests to the NIO HTTP transport. This allows to compare the >> >> behavior of both transports. From that perspective we may leave the >> >> tests in the transports project ... as tests for the testkit :-) >> >> >> >> Andreas >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 17:08, Jarek Gawor <jga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Glen Daniels <g...@thoughtcraft.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> Jarek Gawor wrote: >> >>>>>> Also, I'd really like to get 1.5 out the door ASAP, it's lingered >> way too >> >>>>>> long already. So whatever solution gets us there soonest with >> consensus is >> >>>>>> the one I'll be happy with. >> >>>>> Yes, I agree. Sounds like we already agree on a solution (moving >> http >> >>>>> and local back to Axis2). >> >>>> OK, I'm on this tomorrow. If anyone has issues with it, please pipe >> up! >> >>> I already moved some of the utility classes and methods back to Axis2 >> >>> and eliminated a direct dependency on transport base from http and >> >>> local. But once I was actually looking into moving the http module to >> >>> Axis2 I realized the the http transport tests have dependency on the >> >>> testki module which has dependencies on the transport base module.... >> >>> So we can easily move the transport http code itself but not the >> >>> tests... anybody have ideas how to deal with this now? >> >>> >> >>> Jarek >> >>> >> > >> > > > > -- > Amila Suriarachchi > WSO2 Inc. > blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/ > -- Amila Suriarachchi WSO2 Inc. blog: http://amilachinthaka.blogspot.com/
