Anne
Well I understand the changes and the need for them, but once my WSDL has been published and the clients using it expect the client side to be in a certain way (packaging wise, namespaces etc.) but with 1.3 I cannot say regenerate the WSDL and publish it because what you are suggesting of generating the code from the new WSDL does not produce the same client side stubs expected. So we have to manipulate the WSDL by hand to conform to the namespacing and there by producing the old packaging structure.
From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 6:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: WSDL2Java and Java2WSDL
One way to ensure that your WSDLs are the same is to generate your code from the WSDL rather than vice versa.
But most likely, your Axis 1.1 WSDL will produce interoperability errors. If they contain arrays, they probably have errors. Axis 1.2 and later releases added support for JAX-RPC 1.1 and the WS-I Basic Profile, and they dramatically improved support for document/literal. Lots and lots of changes were made in dealing with arrays.
AnneOn 3/14/06, Siddhartha Subramanian < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been trying something using 1.1 final and 1.3 WSDL2Java and
Java2WSDL produces different types of WSDLs with the Java2WSDL and
WSDL2Java produces different java packaging with the different versions.
Can anyone tell me why the change and what changed between 1.1 and 1.3?
I believe there is no way to generate the same WSDL as the 1.1 final
produced with the 1.3 version. Am I wrong with this statement?
