As Dims said, no toolkit is 100% compliant. In fact it isn't really appropriate to refer to a toolkit as compliant. WS-I compliance applies to a specific service, not to the tools used to implement the service. The more appropriate question to ask is whether you can use Axis to build WS-I compliant services. As Dims said, this is true. You can build WS-I compliant services using Axis.
Martin implied that the only factor affecting WS-I compliance is whether you use a literal schema or SOAP encoding to format the message. Message encoding is by far the most noticable contraint imposed by the WS-I Basic Profile, but there are in fact many rules and constraints defined by the WS-I BP that go way beyond just the simple choice between use="literal" and use="encoded".
In any case, if your partner supplies you with a WS-I compliant WSDL, Axis can generate a WS-I compliant client that can speak to the WS-I compliant service.
Anne
Hi Rodrigo, yes the client will be hosting the service and is giving us the wsdl. So that means we should be fine.
Thanks for the help,
Stephen-----Original Message-----
From: Rodrigo Ruiz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 June 2006 13:47
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Axis Ws-I compliant
Did you mention your client is the one hosting the service?
In that case, if they give you a valid WS-I compliant WSDL, Axis 1.4
should work for you. Just generate your stubs with wsdl2java and use them.Regards,
Rodrigo RuizPrice, Stephen wrote:
> Thanks Martin, so is it just a matter of changing the WSDL to make it
> WSI compliant ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> *Sent:* 23 June 2006 13:05
> *To:* axis-user@ws.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Is Axis Ws-I compliant
>
> Good Morning Stephen-
>
> 'Literal' is WS-I compliant
> encoded is not WS-I compliant..
> changing binding characteristic to RPC-encoded to RPC-literal will
> make your implementation WS-I compliant
>
> Taing,
> Martin --
> This email message and any files transmitted with it contain
> confidential
> information intended only for the person(s) to whom this email
> message is
> addressed. If you have received this email message in error, please
> notify
> the sender immediately by telephone or email and destroy the original
> message without making a copy. Thank you.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Price, Stephen <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* 'axis-user@ws.apache.org' < mailto:'axis-user@ws.apache.org'>
> *Sent:* Friday, June 23, 2006 6:32 AM
> *Subject:* RE: Is Axis Ws-I compliant
>
> Hi Davanum, thanks for that. So what you are saying is that we
> should be OK using axis once our service and wsdl are WS-I
> compliant ? Can you recommend any tools for testing whether our
> wsdl/schema is WS-I compliant ?
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 June 2006 11:18
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org < mailto:axis-user@ws.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Is Axis Ws-I compliant
>
>
> No toolkit is ever 100% compliant. Yes, it is possible to write
> a WS-I
> compliant service and client using some of the toolkits including
> Axis/Axis2. Did you understand the distinction? The key is
> tesing with
> WS-I compliant testing tools and tweaking the wsdl and schema to
> make
> sure they are complaint and cross checking sample messages on
> the wire
> to make sure they are compliant.
>
> -- dims
>
> On 6/23/06, Price, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi, just starting for the first time developing a component
> to communicate with a web service. Our client has sent us the
> wsdl and we were going to use Axis to convert the wsdlto java
> to call the web service. Our client has told us that we
> shouldn't use axis as their service is WS-I compliant, whereas
> Axis is not. I am not 100% sure about this. Can anyone tell me ?
>
> > Thanks,
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> >
> > Stephen Price
> > Software Developer
> > TerraNua
> > ________________________________
>
> > Phone: (+) 353 1 614 5585
> >
> >
> > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Website: www.TerraNua.com
> > ________________________________
>
> > TerraNua Ltd., registered in Ireland no. 288648.
> Registered office: Hardwicke House, Upper Hatch Street,
> Dublin 2. Telephone +353-1-6145400. Any comments or
> statements made are not necessarily those of Fidelity
> Investments, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
>
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://people.apache.org/~dims/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date: 22/06/2006--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
GRIDSYSTEMS Rodrigo Ruiz Aguayo
Parc Bit - Son Espanyol
07120 Palma de Mallorca mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Baleares - Espa�a Tel:+34-971435085 Fax:+34-971435082
http://www.gridsystems.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date: 22/06/2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
