For what its worth, it looks like the latest snapshots do not generate
faults properly. While generating my own wsdl that contains fault
types, I noticed that the types names were named differently that what I
am used to. I then checked the samples... The faulthandling sample
breaks as fault types are generated with the name of the message rather
than the fault name + "Exception". Not sure why this is happening as
the code gen template looks good.
Regression? Or is something changing with respect to generating fault
types names?
Thanks,
Alejandro
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
