On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 22:00, Hu, Mary - ITG <mary...@jpmorgan.com> wrote:
> But Why does it look for ' Provider
>> com.bea.xml.stream.MXParserFactory' by default?

It's the fallback implementation hardcoded in the API.

> I've added xerce pasrer. It's still looking for bea provider.

Xerces is not a StAX parser implementation.

> Mary Hu
> Int: 8.226.2620
> Ext: 973.793.2620
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Veithen [mailto:andreas.veit...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:21 AM
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Provider com.bea.xml.stream.MXParserFactory not found & 
> stax-1.2.0
>
> I would not recommend adding sjsxp.jar. The reason is that Axis2 is
> best tested with Woodstox as StAX parser implementation. Replacing it
> by Sun's implementation may cause subtle issues.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 16:03, Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> bea vendor specific problem
>> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=117971
>>
>> available stax jars are described at
>> http://www.j2ee.me/webservices/docs/1.6/tutorial/doc/SJSXP-jars.html
>>
>> here is the response from the bea release engineer for not including stax
>> jar (sjsxp.jar)
>>
>> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=117971
>>
>> "Any sjsxp.jar would do. The one in the JAX-WS RI would be just fine.
>> The reason we don't ship sjsxp.jar in the JAXB RI is that we don't want
>> people to think that it's a required part of the JAXB"
>>
>> HTH
>> Martin Gainty
>> ______________________________________________
>> Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
>>
>> Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene
>> Empfaenger sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte
>> Weiterleitung oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht
>> dient lediglich dem Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine
>> rechtliche Bindungswirkung. Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von
>> E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
>>
>> Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le
>> destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire
>> informez l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie
>> de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura
>> pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email
>> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter
>> aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Subject: Provider com.bea.xml.stream.MXParserFactory not found & stax-1.2.0
>> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:21:43 +0200
>> From: matthias.gai...@t-systems.com
>> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
>>
>> Hi group,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am encountering some curious problem. I am developing an application with
>> axis2 v1.4.1. I develop the client and the server side. I use eclipse for
>> programming. Last week I had to create a new eclipse workspace, but with the
>> same sources. I also created therefore a new server in eclipse based on my
>> server executables I used before. (Tomcat 5.5).
>>
>> Now when I create a ConfigurationContext on the client side, I get the
>> exception:
>>
>> javax.xml.stream.FactoryConfigurationError: Provider
>> com.bea.xml.stream.MXParserFactory not found
>>
>>
>>
>> I found a solution in the internet that I should add the stax-1.2.0.jar. It
>> is gone with this jar, but I wonder how this can happen? My colleagues are
>> working without that jar and the same code and they have no problems at all.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any insights would be appreciated!!
>>
>>
>>
>> Matthias.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don't worry about storage limits. Check
>> it out.
>
>
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>

Reply via email to