Depends on your definition of "compliant"

If you write a parser that understands all of XML, but may throw away pieces
that it knows you don't want or need, is it out of compliance because it
pre-discarded the information?  I don't know.  If you needed it, I guess it
is out of compliance.  

Jim


Jim Brain, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Researching tomorrow's decisions today."
(319) 369-2070 (work)
SYSTEMS ARCHITECT, ITS, AEGON FINANCIAL PARTNERS

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Bill de h�ra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:57 PM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        Re: Why Pull-Parser faster ?

Brain, Jim wrote:

> Reason:  XPP is tuned for SOAP and structured XML work, where the
whitespace
> and CRLF marks can be assumed to be there for prettiness only, and have no
> code value.

So XPP isn't a compliant XML parser?

Bill de h�ra


Reply via email to