Sounds interesting. Is the code available somewhere for us to look at? On 10/22/03 5:41 AM, "Srinath Perera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dims, > > we agree the changes to axis should be minimal (preferably no changes.) > > How we thought about the project is like this .... > > 1) JSR109 implementation is a tool in axis(like WSDL2Java) which > generates a web service that wraps the J2EE components.(a web service > that do the lookup and map webservice SEI methods to the EJB ...etc ) > It creates a web service that wrap the EJB using the WSDL and the > webservice.xml > > 2)It needs minimal changes to axis (our code is a tool just like > WSDL2Java lets say WSDL2J2EE or something). > > 3) with this tool the axis become JSR109 compliant and the J2EE > container is Geronimo. > > In that case we prefer to stay close with axis. just like a tool > (independent piece of code) :) > > Srianth > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 16:01, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> Srinath, >> >> The more i think about this, the more i am convinced that most of the work >> should be done in >> geronimo with minimum changes to axis itself. Since there needs to be tight >> integration with >> Geronimo and the target is to provide a 109 impl for geronimo. >> >> Thanks, >> dims >> >> --- Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> There is a wiki proposal page created for the JSR109 implementation. >>> it can be found by url >>> >>> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JSR109Proposal >>> >>> Srinath >>> >> >> >> ===== >> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ >> > -- Richard Monson-Haefel Co-Founder\Developer, Apache Geronimo Author of: J2EE Web Services (AW 2003) Enterprise JavaBeans, 4ed (O'Reilly 2004) Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000) http://www.Monson-Haefel.com
