Everyone interested....PLEASE join geronimo-dev list. It's time to move the discussions to just that mailing list. Please don't CC individuals. Please don't involve axis-user as it is just a user group. If and when axis-dev involvement is needed, you can CC that mailing list.
Thanks, dims --- Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sorry if I give a false hope ...it was archtecture I was explainig. Code > is not written yet be have fairly good idea what to done and the > architecture.(I belive) We will start writing it once the discussion > done. > > Srinath > > On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 09:29, Richard Monson-Haefel wrote: > > Sounds interesting. Is the code available somewhere for us to look at? > > > > On 10/22/03 5:41 AM, "Srinath Perera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Dims, > > > > > > we agree the changes to axis should be minimal (preferably no changes.) > > > > > > How we thought about the project is like this .... > > > > > > 1) JSR109 implementation is a tool in axis(like WSDL2Java) which > > > generates a web service that wraps the J2EE components.(a web service > > > that do the lookup and map webservice SEI methods to the EJB ...etc ) > > > It creates a web service that wrap the EJB using the WSDL and the > > > webservice.xml > > > > > > 2)It needs minimal changes to axis (our code is a tool just like > > > WSDL2Java lets say WSDL2J2EE or something). > > > > > > 3) with this tool the axis become JSR109 compliant and the J2EE > > > container is Geronimo. > > > > > > In that case we prefer to stay close with axis. just like a tool > > > (independent piece of code) :) > > > > > > Srianth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 16:01, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > >> Srinath, > > >> > > >> The more i think about this, the more i am convinced that most of the work > > >> should be done in > > >> geronimo with minimum changes to axis itself. Since there needs to be tight > > >> integration with > > >> Geronimo and the target is to provide a 109 impl for geronimo. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> dims > > >> > > >> --- Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> > > >>> There is a wiki proposal page created for the JSR109 implementation. > > >>> it can be found by url > > >>> > > >>> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JSR109Proposal > > >>> > > >>> Srinath > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> ===== > > >> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > >> > > > > > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
