Dennis, Have you submitted any bug reports? on where Axis lacks compliance? Do you have a small example/test case/use-case that we can use to begin work on WS-I compliance?
Thanks, dims --- Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >... > > > >And as for Sun’s JWSDK, again, need more info. My understanding is that > >they shunned the WS-I and Microsoft’s attempts to work on interop. In effect, > >taking them out of the game. A grim statement, if my understanding is still > >accurate. Hopefully, if it is not, someone will clarify their position for us. > > > Just for the record, Sun did not shun the WS-I and interop. The actual > situation is the exact opposite of what you portrayed: Bill Gates > approved Microsoft's participation in WS-I only on the condition that > Sun would not be invited, as shown by one of the emails that came out in > the trials. > > On the plus side for JAX-RPC RI, the 1.1 version included in JWSDP 1.3 > comes with WS-I BP support (something we're unlikely to see from Axis > until sometime next year). Axis is definitely much easier to work with > than the JAX-RPC RI, though, and I think with enough effort you can > build BP-compliant applications using Axis (though only by bypassing the > whole data binding implementation and working with a DOM view of the > data, AFAIK - I put together a doc/lit service using attachments with > this kind of approach last week). > > - Dennis > > Dennis M. Sosnoski > Enterprise Java, XML, and Web Services Support > http://www.sosnoski.com > Redmond, WA 425.885.7197 > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
