Hmmm, I thought the message was very clear...we made no changes...we picked up a cvs snapshot from their cvs and the diff was the diff from their 1.4 version till the day we picked up the sources.
-- dims On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:03:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks. > > Just for clarification, is this a fix that was made locally by Apache? If > so, do you know if it was reported back to IBM? > > Davanum Srinivas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > m> To > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 11/16/2004 12:51 cc > PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject > Re: WSDL4J version bundled with > Please respond to Axis 1.2-beta3 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > he.org > > > > > see http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ws-axis/java/lib/ > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:37:52 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The wsdl4j.jar that has is bundled with Axis1.2-beta3 has a META-INF/ > > MANIFEST.MF stating that it is WSDL4J v1.5. From where was this > obtained? > > IBM's site only lists version 1.4, and CVS makes no mention to a version > > 1.5. > > > > The manifest content is: > > > > Manifest-Version: 1.0 > > Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.1 > > Created-By: 1.3.1_11-b02 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) > > Specification-Title: JWSDL > > Specification-Version: 1.1 > > Specification-Vendor: IBM (Java Community Process) > > Implementation-Title: WSDL4J > > Implementation-Version: 1.5 > > Implementation-Vendor: IBM > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
