Hmmm, not so clear to me, but I understand now... Apache Axis1.2 is using
the latest CVS source versus an official release of WSDL4J.
Thanks for you help.
Davanum Srinivas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m> To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/16/2004 01:17 cc
PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: WSDL4J version bundled with
Please respond to Axis 1.2-beta3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he.org
Hmmm, I thought the message was very clear...we made no changes...we
picked up a cvs snapshot from their cvs and the diff was the diff from
their 1.4 version till the day we picked up the sources.
-- dims
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:03:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Just for clarification, is this a fix that was made locally by Apache?
If
> so, do you know if it was reported back to IBM?
>
> Davanum Srinivas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> m>
To
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 11/16/2004 12:51
cc
> PM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Subject
> Re: WSDL4J version bundled with
> Please respond to Axis 1.2-beta3
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> he.org
>
>
>
>
> see http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/ws-axis/java/lib/
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:37:52 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The wsdl4j.jar that has is bundled with Axis1.2-beta3 has a META-INF/
> > MANIFEST.MF stating that it is WSDL4J v1.5. From where was this
> obtained?
> > IBM's site only lists version 1.4, and CVS makes no mention to a
version
> > 1.5.
> >
> > The manifest content is:
> >
> > Manifest-Version: 1.0
> > Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.1
> > Created-By: 1.3.1_11-b02 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
> > Specification-Title: JWSDL
> > Specification-Version: 1.1
> > Specification-Vendor: IBM (Java Community Process)
> > Implementation-Title: WSDL4J
> > Implementation-Version: 1.5
> > Implementation-Vendor: IBM
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
