-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steffen Schwigon wrote: | Effort should go into getting more feedback for your work. For me it | seems a simple "OK, go for it" from the core developers with cvs | commit rights and a branch for your work would be the most valuable | thing at this moment. With some rules to keep all this compliant to | the Apache.org rules, I can't think of a bad thing that could happen | to AxKit with your experiments. +1
Can't a commiter comment on this? It would be really sad if TomKit and AxKit would split out into two separate projects just because not a single commiter could spend enough time to review the code and say *something* about it on this list. Setting up a CVS branch would not hurt much anyway, would it? Ideally, before TomKit or any other contribution would be merged into a AxKit2 project repository, the "AxKit as TLP"-Project (http://www.mail-archive.com/axkit-dev@xml.apache.org/msg01104.html) would awake from its almost one year sleep and The AxKit Project would have a current Mission Statement and Guidelines (http://axkit.org/wiki/view/AxKit/TLPGuidelineProposal). Kip, haven't you been voted as PMC chair? Anyone: Tom or his company would have to either file a CLA or CCLA (http://www.apache.org/licenses/) before committing anything, right? Enough "would"s for now... - --michael - -- 063A F25E B064 A98F A479 1690 78CD D023 5E2A 6688 http://zis.uibk.ac.at/.m/uibk.ac.at_pgp_pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCwHK+eM3QI14qZogRAo0TAJsEiiWzLdPCNfcnTQWVvnT5pa9MfACbBMU2 inrb+cMdMn2QlfAvvEMlghU= =5Mly -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
