On Tuesday 27 January 2004 22:14, Michael A Nachbaur wrote: > Hmm...okay. So, you wanna take perl completely out of the picture.
Well, yeah, I aim for no Perl in the XSP XML. I had to include a few semicolons here and there due to problems combining taglibs from different helpers (any progress on that, Matt?), but that's about it... :-) (yup, I'm a real purist... But I guess I really should be working with a pragmatist to get things done quicker... :-) ) > > May I suggest an element, something like > > <param:get-all name="foo"/> > > that if given the query ?foo=bar&foo=baz > > will return > > <value>bar</value> > > <value>baz</value> > > So I gather you're going to be post-processing this? Yup, XSLT should handle it just afterwards. And since I've been using a 'value' element for all the simpler controls in my form, it is quite convienent to use here too. > > Possibly, the name of the element (instead of 'value') could be an > > attribute too, and perhaps an optional element around these... > > Actually, I added an optional "name" attribute to "enumerate", so you could > say: Oh, but that ruined your surprise! :-) Actually, I thought about it, but found a new element more desireable, but this is great too! > <param:enumerate name="foo"/> Yup, I've tested it on a few very simple examples, and it seems to work great! Thanks a lot! :-) > > Okay, this should be fixed. Uh, almost... It seems to count the query parameters correctly, but at least on my system when using BasicSession, it counts those parameters too... >The latest version is in CVS. Try it, test > it, and let me know how it worked out. Yup, it worked great, except that one probably isn't expecting to have the BasicSession parameters counted... :-) > One of the nice things about using AxKit as a central part of your > company's business is that you get good servers to develop on. One of the > downsides of the same, is that now everyone relies on it, which means you > can no longer do ad-hoc code changes, or you'll *instantly* hear everyone > groan "SCAMP's down!" *sigh* Yeah, I can imagine... :-) > You know, it occurs to me that this would be well-suited to the axkit-devel > mailing list. Oh well. Hehe, yeah I guess so, but when I posted the message, I thought that it was just something I was missing, a typical user question... :-) Cheers, Kjetil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
