Is it correct to list all marriages of an ancestor, even those that produced no children?
In building my family tree, I have been showing all marriages, even those that ended in divorce or death but without children. Someone recently questioned whether it is "correct" to list non-relatives who do not factor into genealogy because there were no children. My stand is that whatever happened in the family--birth, marriage, death--gets shown. What do others on this list do? Tomás -- For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail (vacation) mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Azores. Click in the blue area on the right that says "Join this group" and it will take you to "Edit my membership." --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Azores Genealogy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to azores@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/azores.
