On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 03:04:07PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > here are patches targetted for 2.6.36. All patches needed for that patchset > > are already part of your staging-next tree. > > > > All patches are cleanup patches and no new feature is added. > > > > thanks, > > Sven > > > > Antonio Quartulli (1): > > Staging: batman-adv: Convert names from Java to C style > > > > Linus Lüssing (1): > > Staging: batman-adv: Avoid rounding issues for local hna timeout > > > > Marek Lindner (4): > > Staging: batman-adv: replace manual calculation by msecs_to_jiffies() > > for better readability > > Staging: batman-adv: Add sysfs abi documentation > > about bonding > > Staging: batman-adv: adapting source version to revised > > versioning scheme Staging: batman-adv: fix early debugfs deinitialization > > > > Simon Wunderlich (1): > > Staging: batman-adv: Lower resolution for timeouts > > > > Sven Eckelmann (3): > > Staging: batman-adv: Add include guards to all header files > > Staging: batman-adv: Allow to build it inside the kernel > > Staging: batman-adv: Remove dependency to PROCFS > > Hi, > > we send you those 10 patches 10 days ago and they don't seem to be merged in > you staging-next tree. Linus has already released -rc4 after his vacation and > it is unclear to me how long it takes until 2.6.35 is released and I am not > allowed to submit patches for 2.6.36.
It will be a few more weeks before .35 is released. Please note that I was working on 5 stable kernel updates last week plus an extended holliday weekend here and then there's my "real job" that I also have to do :) I should get to your patches this week, don't worry, they will make it into .36 with no problem. > Do you think that I can still submit some patches to you for 2.6.36 or should > I wait for 2.6.37? Please send them on, if they go on top of these, I have no problems adding them. thanks, greg k-h
