Henning Rogge wrote: > Am Samstag 10 Juli 2010, 10:40:52 schrieb Sven Eckelmann: > > Daniel Seither wrote: > > > Am 10.07.2010 01:07, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > > batman-adv works quite well for us - but that doesn't mean that it is > > > > good in context of the current kernel development. And who should > > > > know it better than the netdev guys. > > > > > > Hagen Paul Pfeifer suggested in his message "a generalized architecture > > > and a user space implementation of the protocol". What came to my mind > > > when I read this again was a division of control plane and > > > data/forwarding plane as known from traditional routing. > > > > > > The whole forwarding stuff would stay in the kernel, using a simple > > > routing table (for destination X, send to node Y on interface Z). > > > > This would go against the bonding/alternating functionality. > > The bonding/alternating functionality could be part of the routing > framework. I think there is something similar on IP layer routing in > linux.
Yes, I know that it must be part of the routing framework - just the ruleset
he explained is not sufficient for that task.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
