On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 08:41:11 PM David Miller wrote: [...] > The namespace pollution of the batman-adv code needs to improve, > and I'm putting my foot down starting with this change. > > If you have a static function which is therefore private to a > source file, name it whatever you want. > > But once it gets exported out of that file, you have to give it > an appropriate name. Probably with a "batman_adv_" prefix or > similar.
I aggree, but would like to like to have a shorter prefix batadv_. I know that
you said "or similar" but there are still some developers that fear your
response to a patch that only adds the prefix batadv_ instead of the longer
version.
Could you please approve or disapprove this proposal.
Thanks,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
