2011/7/21 Pavel Roskin <[email protected]>: > On 07/20/2011 11:35 AM, Michael Büsch wrote: >> >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:10:55 +0200 >> Rafał Miłecki<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sorry, for not explaining this well eno >>> ugh. I'm afraid of situation where b44 driver supports 64-bit DMA >>> device *without* handling this as such a device. >> >> A b44 or b43legacy device with 64bit DMA engine does not exist. > > There are many references to "B43legacy_DMA_64BIT" and "dma64_ops" in > b43legacy. I guess they all are unneeded, and so is struct > b43legacy_dma_ops. > > b44 doesn't seem to have DMA64 support. By the way, the result of > ssb_dma_translation() is placed into bp->dma_offset. I think the word > "offset" is misleading.
Thanks for comment. I didn't have any time to review (&clean?) b43legacy, not to mention b44. Unfortunately I'm too busy with b43 stuff for now. If you have some free time, you're input to the drivers is welcome :) -- Rafał _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
