On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:33:51 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/7/21 Pavel Roskin <[email protected]>: > > On 07/20/2011 11:35 AM, Michael Büsch wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:10:55 +0200 > >> Rafał Miłecki<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Sorry, for not explaining this well eno > >>> ugh. I'm afraid of situation where b44 driver supports 64-bit DMA > >>> device *without* handling this as such a device. > >> > >> A b44 or b43legacy device with 64bit DMA engine does not exist. > > > > There are many references to "B43legacy_DMA_64BIT" and "dma64_ops" in > > b43legacy. I guess they all are unneeded, and so is struct > > b43legacy_dma_ops. > > > > b44 doesn't seem to have DMA64 support. By the way, the result of > > ssb_dma_translation() is placed into bp->dma_offset. I think the word > > "offset" is misleading. > > Thanks for comment. I didn't have any time to review (&clean?) > b43legacy, not to mention b44. Unfortunately I'm too busy with b43 > stuff for now. If you have some free time, you're input to the drivers > is welcome :) > For historical reasons there is unused 64bit dma code in b43legacy. I'm not sure whether it would even work. Probably not. Larry's fixes were most likely not ported over. _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
