On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:51:52 +0100 Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> wrote:
> > I think the answer should be that no matter how you mess with the metrics > > babel should still remain loop-free, right? > > Both Babel and BGP should remain loop-free whatever you do. However, when > you redistribute routes between protocols, there's no guarantee that the > union of the two graphs remains loop-free. > > So if you're not careful you could end up in a situation where Babel > maintains a loop-free forwarding graph, BGP maintains a loop-free > forwarding graph, but there exists a loop that goes Babel -> BGP -> Babel. > > -- Juliusz We almost experienced such a situation as well. Bird always prefers Babel over BGP, unfortunately. > > _______________________________________________ > Babel-users mailing list > Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users -- Marek Küthe m...@mk16.de er/ihm he/him
pgpMuY5mLR_2C.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users