On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:59 PM, P Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was hoping to avoid introducing another dependency with memcached, but > I'll consider it. > > I guess my question should be more pointed. The test case seems to evaluate > basic functionality, which appears not to work. Have others experienced this > bug (on mac os)? Or is it likely that this is a configuration dependent bug? > Has this been addressed in the git version of bdrb? Is a stable version of > bdrb that works on mac os forthcoming? >
Oh, please run git version. I am bad at syncing code with svn (And yes there has been fixes that went into git, but aren't there in svn). _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
