On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:59 PM, P Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was hoping to avoid introducing another dependency with memcached, but > I'll consider it. >
Well, think in long run, assuming your workers store hundreds of thousands of objects in worker cache. How will Ruby take that? I bet, half the time will be spent in trying to garbage collect the shit. So, if you are planning to cache results at all, memcache is certainly far better solution. Of course, you can keep using inbuilt cache, but it will scale only so such. _______________________________________________ Backgroundrb-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/backgroundrb-devel
